Ranking JoJo's Parts: From Best to Worst

TLDRA discussion between Joey, Charlie, and Garnt about their rankings of the different parts of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure.

Key insights

🥇Part 2 is a fan-favorite due to the introduction of Joseph Joestar.

🎭Part 4 is loved by many despite its slow start and slice-of-life elements.

🌟Part 5 is ranked highly but lacks a standout main character.

🕰️Part 6 is highly anticipated by fans, but opinions are divided on its initial episodes.

🎬Part 3 is criticized for its long runtime and repetitive monster-of-the-week format.

Q&A

Which is the best part of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure?

Opinions vary, but many fans consider Part 2 to be the best due to its engaging storyline and memorable characters.

What makes Part 4 unique?

Part 4 stands out for its slice-of-life elements and a gripping narrative that picks up in the later episodes.

Why is Part 5 highly ranked?

Part 5 is praised for its intense action and unique stand abilities, but it is often criticized for lacking a strong protagonist.

What can fans expect from Part 6?

Part 6 is highly anticipated, but opinions are divided on its initial episodes. It promises new JoJo adventures and unexpected plot twists.

What are the drawbacks of Part 3?

Part 3 is criticized for its long runtime and repetitive monster-of-the-week format, which can make it feel draggy at times.

Timestamped Summary

00:00Joey, Charlie, and Garnt discuss their rankings of the different parts of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure.

09:36Joey explains why he prefers Part 1 over other parts due to its classic anime feel and strong art style.

19:59Charlie defends his opinion of favoring Part 4, praising its unique slice-of-life elements and strong finish.

32:40Garnt shares his thoughts on Part 5, acknowledging its gripping action but expressing dissatisfaction with its protagonist.

48:21The trio discusses their expectations and divided opinions on Part 6, which introduces new adventures and plot twists.

01:00:08They delve into the drawbacks of Part 3, acknowledging its long runtime and repetitive format as potential downsides.